When I watch a movie, my thinking always wanders to the same few questions.
How is this a story for our time?
What does this film tell us about ourselves, our deepest feelings, our secret thoughts, our invisible yearnings?
And how conscious are the filmmakers themselves about these processes?
Because we seem to be living in a time of converging crises, and because I am sensitive to that, I view most films through that lens. Being both a filmmaker and a cultural critic, it is an occupational hazard that I quite enjoy.
As Copenhagen unfolds, I notice some patterns in the media conversation: new examinations of confusion and denial; repeated attempts to explain and convince; more proposals of crucial solutions and necessary policies; timely reports on the severity of the situation. One question that seems to wander through these articles and essays and reports is this: why can’t we seem to get our shit together when it comes to climate change? The failure of Copenhagen feels, to many, like a foregone conclusion. So, like, What the What?
Good question. One that seems to apply to much of the present predicament in which we find ourselves. And one, I think, that will benefit from a viewing of Ridley Scott’s 1991 “Zeitgeist-catching” road movie, Thelma & Louise.
Go watch it. I’ll wait.
OK. You back? Good. Let’s move on.
So, if the question is why can’t we seem to get our shit together when it comes to climate change? then most of the answers I hear seem to fall into one of three categories. It’s because we (or our leaders) are:
stuck in distraction and/or denial,
greedy, unprincipled and maybe even psychotic or evil or
just too stupid to go on living.
To me these are all reasonable explanations. Distraction and denial are surely in force, as are those other human possibilities: greed, psychosis, evil, and stupidity. If you view our movies, as I do, as the stories of Imperialism, which reveal how we view both the world and ourselves, then you’ll find overwhelming evidence to support these assessments. But I think I see something more at work here. Something more fundamental, perhaps, or more invisible. And invisible, maybe, because it just breaks too many rules, to speak about it.
Here’s what I see: our collective death wish at work.
Hang with me for a moment. I have no doubt that our egos have been left battered, bruised, and pretty much insane by the experience of being born into captivity in what Derrick Jensen calls “the culture of make-believe“. I’ve experienced that insanity intimately in my own life. And once I identified it, I could see it all around me, at work in the world. But I also have a sense that my true self, my essence, that good and beautiful being I came here as, has not been destroyed. My animal body senses, perceives, and moves through the world at levels above, below and beyond the warped and word-bound ego that thinks it is in charge. My essential self remains in close and constant connection with a reality that far exceeds any mental constructs my thinking might wish to lay on it.
What if, apart from the denial, stupidity, or greed to which our ego-bound thoughts and words are too often constrained, our bodies know exactly what’s coming down? What if the reason we’re not getting our shit together when it comes to climate change is because our essential selves are not buying a bit of what our egos are being told about how to address this “problem”? What if, in fact, at some deep level from which we cannot even speak, those parts of our being that have not been distorted, distracted or destroyed by the absurdities of Empire regard climate change, in some crucial way, not as a “problem” at all, but as a “solution”?
Hard to imagine? Let’s go back to Thelma & Louise.
This movie was a “huge critical success”, clocking in as the 88th best-reviewed movie of all time at metacritic.com. It was nominated for six Academy Awards, and won for Best Original Screenplay. If it’s correct to call this film “Zeitgeist-catching”, then what part of “the defining spirit or mood of our times” does it catch? Pull over there. Let’s check the map.
Thelma and Louise leave their loveless, abused, and unsatisfying lives behind for a weekend fling together. A bit of fun leads to the attempted rape of Thelma, in response to which Louise kills the offender. They run, sure that they’ll never get a fair hearing in a court of law, and their attempts to flee to Mexico spiral out of control. As the charges against them pile up, they find a surprising exhilaration in their unanticipated life of crime. It all comes to a standoff at the edge of a cliff. Trapped in a situation with no acceptable solutions, poised between a line of state troopers and the sympathetic detective who has been trying to bring them in on the one hand, and the vast unknown of that cliff on the other, Thelma and Louise choose the cliff. The film ends with that iconic freeze frame, as they launch themselves in their ’66 Thunderbird into the only freedom they can imagine.
If that’s the map, then the territory is our own world, our own culture, our own lives. If Thelma & Louise shows us the Geist, it’s the Geist of our own Zeit. And if we allow that as our starting point, then the connections come easily enough. Did not the culture of civilization, at some point, take off on a weekend fling of unexpected exhilaration that spiraled out of control, bringing the entire planet face to face with our present predicament? And have not many people’s lives, at least those lived here in the heart of Empire, become so loveless, abused and unsatisfying that we’re poised now to do almost anything to get out of them? Have we not truly managed to do something no other living creature has managed to do, which is to make ourselves, individually and collectively, miserable?
Aye, now I’ve done it. I’ve violated a deep taboo, spoken the unspeakable. Because, well, we’re so happy, we Americans. Aren’t we?
I mean, sure, we’ve got corrupt leadership, economic insanity, and the end of cheap energy to contend with. We’ve got climate change and population overshoot and mass extinction to think about. We’ve got dying oceans, dying forests, dying aquifers, dying krill, dying caribou, dying everything. We’ve got nuclear power and nuclear waste and nuclear weapons and depleted uranium. We’ve got fucked up political systems, health care systems, educational systems, economic systems, agricultural systems, and septic systems. We’ve got racism, sexism, narcissism, workaholism and fascism. We’ve got child abuse and elder abuse and spouse abuse and animal abuse. We’ve got rapes and murders and suicides. We’ve got unwed mothers and single parents and children having children. We’ve got addictions, distractions, obsessions and compulsions. We’ve got unemployment and underemployment and homelessness and debt. We’ve got boring, meaningless work, longer hours, longer drive times and falling real wages. We’ve got unsatisfying relationships, loneliness, divorce and broken homes. We’ve got mental illness, stress, busy-ness, depression, despair, medication and “the deliberate dumbing down of America“. We’ve got obesity, diabetes, asthma, cancer and heart disease and all those other “diseases of civilization“. And sure, all of these things seem to be spiraling out of control, as if Conquest, War, Famine and Pestilence just stormed onto our polo field and started to beat the ever-loving crap out of our players.
But, c’mon! We’ve also got 24,909 tunes on our iPods! We’ve got Trundled Duck Confit with a Gorgonzola Reduction! We’ve got shamanic excursions into the heart of the Andes! We’ve got that new James Cameron movie coming out! In 3-fucking-D! Surely it all balances out? Surely, surely, this all counts for something? I mean, you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs, right? And the upholstery in this ’66 Thunderbird is just luscious, isn’t it?
I’ve got to stop and wonder whether comfort and distraction have been confused with joy, fulfillment and meaning. I acknowledge that it’s possible to find moments of comfort and happiness even in prison. That doesn’t mean we’re not in prison. I view this as our deepest denial, the denial of the truth of our own life experience, the denial kept in rigid place by our desperate story of The American Way. As David Edwards says in his interview with Derrick Jensen,
What prison could be more secure than one we’re convinced is “the world,” where the boundaries of action and thought are assumed to be, not the limits of the permissible, but the limits of the possible? Democratic society, as we know it, is the ultimate prison, because who’s going to try to escape from a situation of apparent freedom? It follows, then, that we must be happy, because we can do whatever we want.
Copenhagen unfolds. The cliff approaches…
Go back to those last minutes in the movie. We learn, finally, how deep Louise’s wounds go, how vast is her pain. We see the chase. The attempted escape. The final capture. We see the line of police cruisers. The helicopter hovers menacingly overhead. The sniper rifles aim their way. The “good cop” has failed to bring them in but argues angrily for one last attempt. The “bad cop” uses his PA system to order them to give up. Thelma and Louise are not buying any of it. They’re fed up with living lives in prison.
Thelma looks at Louise. “Let’s keep going,” she says
“What do you mean?”
Thelma looks out over the cliff, nods her head almost imperceptibly.
“Go,” she says.
Smiles and tears flit across their faces.
“You sure?”
“Yeah.”
They kiss, their faces a study in love and grief and terror and power.
Louise hits the gas.
They hold hands.
They speed toward the cliff.
And they’re gone…
Can we just hold silence here for a few seconds?
Thank you.
I think Ridley Scott failed in this moment, as Roger Ebert so gratifyingly pointed out. Having spent two hours building up to this point, Scott could not hold it. Rather then just sit with the tension, the grief, the surprise, the pain, or the exhilaration, his freeze frame dissolved way too quickly into white. And the white dissolved right into rolling end credits, that haunting score, and a snapshot review of their happier times. As Ebert said, “Can one shot make that big of a difference? This one does.”
But now, here in our Zeit, we are given an opportunity to correct that failure. In this time of seeming collapse, as we sit staring over our own collective cliff, perhaps because, 18 years since the movie’s release, we are more desperate now, or perhaps because we have each other, we can hold the shot that Ridley Scott could not. We can sit with that tension, that grief, that surprise, that pain, and that exhilaration. We can hold that freeze frame and feel it to the very depths of the canyon underneath. We can look at this hidden piece of Geist and see what it is that the public, as a whole, seemed to resonate with so deeply. And we can learn, perhaps, in doing that, what there is to be learned in this moment.
I wonder if we’re not getting our shit together when it comes to climate change because, at some level, we’re not buying it, just as Thelma and Louise didn’t buy it, no matter the assurances of the nice white guy in the suit, or the threats of the stern authority figure in the uniform. We’re not buying the notion that this predicament will somehow get “fixed” by any combination of carbon caps, emissions agreements, green shopping, alternative energies and new technologies under the sun.
Some months ago, the specter of 4 degree C temperature rise started bouncing around in the news. Just a few weeks back, there were new reports that we’re on our way to 6 degrees C if we keep going as we are. And another new study reports that global CO2 emissions have risen 29% in the past nine years, indicating our commitment to doing just that. Six degrees moves us into the realm of the End-Permian extinction event, during which roughly nine-tenths of the lifeforms on the planet said their last farewells.
It seems… well… unlikely… that corrupt and insane leaders will have much say in such matters, as energy, environment and economy slip rapidly from our hands, as if they ever really were in our hands to begin with. Conquest, War, Famine and Pestilence seem now to have made their way up to the clubhouse. Hard to believe that that padlocked gate is going to hold.
And I wonder if we’re not buying any attempt to fix this problem that has as its goal the preservation of the culture of Empire. I think, collectively, our bodies are not buying that. Our sane essential selves are not buying that. iPods and duck confit DO NOT outweigh the costs to our souls of lives lived in prison and the destruction of the community of life. And sadly, we do not see that anything less than global catastrophe will free us from our collective insanity.
It is forbidden to say this out loud, of course, even to ourselves. It’s just too painful, to face into just how miserable we have become as a people, how lost, how wounded, how stuck. And how pointless life seems. As we asked in What a Way to Go:
“Are we destroying the planet, as Dmitry Orlov asks, just ‘to be somewhat more comfortable for a little while’?”
It’s too much to bear. And truly, why should we? Maybe Warren Zevon was right. If the planet’s now headed toward six degrees, “as the mystics and statistics say it will,” why not go out like desperadoes, our foot on the pedal, our hair just flying in the wind, taking out Empire as we go?
And “heaven help the one who leaves.”
Ultimately, what I think we are not buying, body and soul, is the notion that this is all there is, this “physical reality” of corrupt leaders, insane systems, working, shopping and fucking and dying. We’re not buying this whole “materialism” thang, this deadened world, this end of magic, this loss of meaning. We’re not buying it. The costs are too high. The benefits too shallow. And the growing edges of our own science seem no longer to support such notions. The anomalies have been piling up in the corner for so long now that we can hardly get through the door. We can still sense, despite the bullshit that has been heaped upon our minds, a Cosmos far more wondrous than either the suit or the uniform can even begin to imagine.
Indeed. Go back to that last scene. Watch closely. Look at Thelma’s face. Watch Louise’s reaction. The excitement mixed with terror. The wonder fused with grief. The pain of wounds so deep they drive us over the cliff. If Thelma and Louise are running away in their final act, they are also running toward. It’s in their eyes. They can see it. Beyond that cliff lies not only the end of this madness, but the beginning of something new. A step into that unknown Cosmos that has never abandoned us, even as we abandoned it. Plunging over a cliff is not an act of control. It’s an act of intention. And surrender. And trust.
Climate change may be a fuck-all mess, but at least it’ll get us out of this nightmare, and take us to some place new.
Hit the gas.
“Go!”
I do not wish to be mistaken here, though I’m fairly certain that I shall be. I merely wish to point out that, from where I sit, these forces are alive in our collective heart. I know they are alive in mine. I have no idea whether Thelma and Louise made the right choice. I do not know that we “should” hit the gas, whatever that means. The full manifestation of current trends is poised to take out a great deal more than human beings. It already has. It would certainly be my wish to kill off just the culture, rather than the vast majority of the community of life. As Derrick Jensen said in What a Way to Go:
So many people are so very, very unhappy. And they want this nightmare to end. And they don’t recognize that the death that they want is a cultural death, and is a spiritual and metaphorical death.
This death wish is here, part of the spirit of the times, and I say that it’s exactly what Thelma & Louise tapped into, exactly what caught its viewers in the throat, exactly what caused the members of the Academy to honor that Best Original Screenplay. Our collective misery, and our wish for the death of the culture that underlies that misery, hover still in that great freeze-frame of our present predicament. If we fade-to-white too quickly, if we insist on our snapshots of happier times, then we will miss a deep truth of this moment, and the opportunity to learn from this moment what there may be to learn.
Our failure to respond may, indeed, spring from denial, greed, and stupidity. Those are all likely suspects. But it may also be grounded in the deep longing of our bodies and the wisdom of our souls. Whatever the reasons, when it comes to our collective reaction so far, we’re not buying what’s being sold. We do not seem eager to “save civilization.” It may behoove us to wonder why that is.
If we face into this death wish, if we stare into our collective misery, both as the conquered and as the conquerors, and allow the truth of our culture, a culture that would drive us to this cliff, to rise into conscious acknowledgment, we may find, in doing so, a choice that now eludes us. It’s a possibility. One that I don’t think we have much explored.
We’re sitting on a cliff in a ’66 Thunderbird, staring into the abyss of the insoluble predicament. None of the choices we can imagine are acceptable.
Now what?
Nice analogy to use the desperation portrayed in an emotive movie scene to convey the helplessness of those people who wish to escape the prison of our insane culture.
I think the turning point of our culture (which there inevitably will be) will be a mixture of a slow awakening of the masses (a bubbling of discontent - like the occupy movement) and a few serious sparks (un-suppressible moments of public outrage) in quick succession that will light the tinderbox. But we must be aware that (hopelessly un-awakened) scaremongering officials of our culture will try to suppress the tide of change to entrench the status quo. They will try to bring down the shutters of the susceptible and constantly bombarded public and tell them it’s an attack on them. Its not!. They will try to bring in highly restrictive policies to confine and punish the awakened. We need to educate as many people as we can about the benefits of change and the disaster of an existence we are holding on to. We need the majority to want this.
I’d like to see a change sooner rather than later - for the sake of our planet and our cultures collective sanity. But I think as many people as possible should be aware of why we want the change and where we are going. I’d like to see someone at every public forum for discussion mentioning the issues our culture has created - intelligently and creatively if possible. We need to have these issues constantly in the public consciousness. Any revolution won’t be effective without it. They want us to keep calm, go home and close the curtains, baton down the doors and of course go to work for the machine the next day. When the time is right we can all down tools - collectively!
After many months of procrastination and distraction, I finally found the time and summoned up the courage to watch your incredible documentary.
While already very much aware of all the issues addressed, the cumulative effect portrayed in such an intense, sobering and yet at the same time poetic manner had me gasing for air. I sat motionless, almost paralyzed, mentally and emotionally drained, groping silenttly for answers, solutions, meaning (most definitely meaning). Above all, release from the reminder of humanity’s incredible, never-ending surplus of ignorance, arrogance and lack of self-control.
Evidence that most people are still not getting it is what prompted me to send the letter below. Alright, so you folks do not have the answers. In fact, as you point out, no sane, honest, aware person would proffer easy or quick recommendations for extricating ourselves from this self-created quagmire. I DO get that. But, then, where does that leave us, individually and collectively? What to do, communicate, cope under such extreme and unprecedented circumstances. That’s really a rhetorical question as you two are obviously neither lying, delusional or ill-informed. Quite the contrary.
BTW, before ending, I must point out one, apparently inadvertent, error in the film. At the end you most emphatically include a cautionary disclaimer about not having a happy ending. However, perhaps in spite of your best intentions, the words of wisdom did sound, at least to my ears, like a glimmer of hope. Like denial, it is so very easy for us vulnerable humans to seek optimism, even in the most frightening and dangerous situations. I am reminded of reading a passage in Viktor Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning in which prisoners in a concentration camp were able to appreciate a beautiful sunrise. This is not to deny any truths in the movie or what your essay expresses. However, it can be something to use and return to as a starting point for discussion and action. Being real, honest, awake and aware does not preclude hope. My two cents.
Ron Landskroner
Oakland, CA
—————————————————————————————————————————-
No, these actions are no longer either unbelievable or are they to be considered shocking. For, they are part and parcel (one might even say a natural outgrowth) of a cancerous and out-of-control system in the hands of an amoral, elitist cadre hell-bent on draining the Earth and its inhabitants dry, both literally and figuratively. The messages below are merely a representative, though significant, sampling of same.
The time to end personal as well as public expressions of incredulity in the face of a daily deadly assault on ourselves, the planet and our non-human brethren is long overdue. We should no longer be fearful of recognizing and acknowledging the ugly reality before us, of those individuals and institutions behind that reality who benefit (at least in the short term) from the greed, arrogance, cruelty and corruption which are the lincpins of our current unsustainable and crumbling system. We need to furthermore understand and communicate among ourselves and to the wider community to what degree EVERYTHING is connected, stemming from the same rotten core.
Those sworn to uphold the laws consistently and continually ignore their pledge, shirking their responsibility to the common good while feigning good intent. They are accountable only to themselves and each other in an ever more closed circle which is strangling every living thing. No one and nothing is able to escape their clutches. As a result, we are feted to an endless state of war. War on all peoples in every corner of the globe, on decency, truth, ethics, on life itself.
The Occupy movement was a good, albeit disjointed, beginning. But that energy and awareness needs to gain greater momentum, focus and scrutiny. It needs to take the form of a far deeper and wider mass effort, addressing the myriad causes, examples and ramifications of a dying system, as well as proposing a rational and cohesive agenda of alternatives.
So many groups, so many seemingly disparate causes. They are all are born of the same cloth, only of differing shapes and coloring.
As Benjamin Franklin is alleged to have said: “If we don’t hang together, by Heavens we shall hang separately.” First, connect the dots. Then, connect the people.
Ron Landskroner
Oakland, CA
————————————————————————————————
Shocking Abuses Uncovered at Tyson Pork Supplier
Dear Ron,
The Humane Society of the United States released undercover video footage revealing cruel treatment of animals and inhumane conditions at a Wyoming pig breeding facility owned by a supplier to Tyson Foods. The investigation revealed workers kicking piglets like soccer balls, swinging sick piglets in circles, and ruthlessly beating mother pigs. Along with individual acts of animal abuse, this investigation also highlights the suffering pigs endure when locked in metal “gestation crates” where they cannot even turn around for nearly their whole lives — a standard pork industry practice.
Burger King, McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Safeway, Compass Group (the world’s largest food service provider), and other major food companies have announced, at the urging of The HSUS, that they’ll remove gestation crates from their supply chains. As several leading pork producers are actively moving in that direction, Tyson lags far behind and still defends this extreme confinement. We need your help to move the company to do the right thing. Will you please help pigs by urging Tyson to stop allowing them to be confined in tiny gestation crates? Thank you for all you do for animals.
Wayne Pacelle, President & CEO
————————————————————————-
Dear Ron,
Last week, WildEarth Guardians filed suit to stop a horrendous climate catastrophe from unfolding in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming: Four new coal leases that would expand the world’s largest coal mines, leading to the release of more than 3.5 billion metric tons of carbon pollution.
But as powerful as our legal efforts are, we need your help to reverse the disastrous course we’re on. Sign our petition today calling on U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to put a freeze on new coal in the Powder River Basin.
It’s not just because coal kills. Our federal leasing program is a massive taxpayer giveaway, to the tune of billions of dollars to huge coal companies. Worse, horrible strip mining and lax reclamation has left the land scarred. But it’s the link to global warming that has us fired up.
In 2009, Salazar told the world, “Carbon pollution is putting our world—and our way of life—in peril.”
Unbelievably, since that time Salazar has overseen the most dramatic increase in coal production in U.S. history, with his Interior Department proposing 7 billion tons of new strip mining in the Powder River Basin, enough to fuel roughly 100 power plants for the next 100 years.
That’s not cool.
Already the largest coal producing region in the country, the Powder River Basin fuels hundreds of power plants, producing 13% of our nation’s carbon pollution. And increasingly, companies are not only taking billions from the taxpayers through cheap federal coal leases, but also shipping the coal overseas to Asia and Europe.
Salazar’s actions would lock us into decades of more coal and more carbon, putting, as he said himself, our world—and our way of life—in peril.
It’s a taxpayer ripoff and it comes at the expense of our land and our climate. It’s time put an end to this. It’s time to put a chill on new coal. Sign our petition today and demand that Secretary Salazar enact a moratorium on new leasing and mining in the Powder River Basin.
We can’t strip mine our way to a safe climate. And more than ever our planet needs a good freeze.
——————————————————————————-
For the Wild,
Jeremy Nichols
Climate and Energy Program Director
WildEarth Guardians
jnichols@wildearthguardians.org
————————————————————————————————
Dear Ron,
Oil companies are destroying rainforests in Belize.
Forests surrounding the village of Conejo, home to dozens of indigenous Maya Q’eqchi’ families, are being systematically torn down in an effort to make a profit from oil extracted from their land.
Fight back and help protect indigenous rights!
Communities need $4,000 to support the following activities:
Hiring legal counsel to advise the communities on their rights;
Conducting damage assessments done to the land;
Improving communication capabilities to keep community members up-to-date on all developments.
If everyone we reach out to gives just $5, we would reach our goal and help the communities of Conejo in no time! Every gift will be matched - dollar for dollar!
The oil companies are powerful, well funded, and intimidating. They are purposefully ignoring the 2007 decision passed by the Supreme Court of Belize affirming the land rights of the communities based on Mayan customary law. We need to support indigenous rights and take a stand against big oil’s abuse of land and disregard for the law.
Don’t let oil win again!
The oil companies are taking advantage of these communities and manipulating the system to their advantage. Don’t let them. Take a stand and show your support today!
Every dollar counts and will be matched! Your involvement gives strength to indigenous communities and a voice to those ignored.
Thank you for your support,
Barbara Vallarino
Director of Development
——————————————————————————————————-
Curb the Corporate Agenda of Activist CEOs
http://action.citizen.org/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=9213&tag=chapLCV12
Hi Ron. Thanks for your very kind words. I’m glad you watched it, and that it moved you.
It may be that the great opportunity here is for us to find out who we are/will be as we stare into unanswerable questions and insoluble problems. And it may be true to say that we do not have YOUR answer. We just have OUR OWN, an answer we create on a daily basis, an answer that feels always temporary and ephemeral. Both collectively and individually, our present predicament feels to me like a school whose curriculum is designed to foster the psychological, emotional, and spiritual maturation of human beings. So my focus tends to be on “what is there to be learned from all of this, such that the destruction and pain we have caused in our long experiment in separation, control, and delusion gets redeemed in some way, so that the destruction and pain is not for naught?” I don’t see that our present global trends will be thwarted. It may be that they can be survived by some portion of the community of life, including some portion of human beings. If so, I’m interested in who we will be on the other side, and taking whatever steps I can take that might help us feel our way into some new way of being on the planet.
Regarding the Happy Chapter™, that’s one I’ve heard before. Seems like a matter of language. What I said was:
“I have read many books about the world situation. And I have noticed a curious thing: the happy chapter. After an entire book of dire prognostications and appalling facts comes the chapter at the end that says that if we only do this and this and that we’ll find the solution, that while there is much to give us concern, there is also much about which we can be hopeful.
I don’t like happy chapters. They’ve lulled me back to sleep. They suggest that somebody somewhere somehow is handling it. I can just go on with my life. And hey, we’ve got thirty years or so, right? That’s lots of time.
I’m sorry, folks, but I think time’s up. I have no happy chapter to offer you; no list of quick and painless fixes; no plan that will keep the train rolling forever on this track. I see no way for that to happen. If there is going to be a happy chapter, we shall have to write it together, with the rest of the community of life, on the pages of the living world.”
To my thinking, I provided no “solution” for which we can be hopeful, no quick and painless fix, no plan to keep the train rolling forever, no suggestion that somebody somewhere can or is handling it. As I said, I don’t think such things are possible. So it does not feel to me, given the way I’ve defined the term, that I ended up providing a Happy Chapter™ of my own. (I should have ended it with slightly different wording: “if there is going to be a happy ENDING, we shall have to write it together.” That would have been more in alignment with my use of the term Happy Chapter, I think, if less “poetic.”)
But that does not mean we cannot find happiness and joy in the midst of it, that we cannot find our sense of self and power, that we cannot live our lives to the fullest, or that there are no possibilities. I think we can find joy and power and connection even as we face into the distinct probability that there is no hope of “saving civilization,” and it was this which I tried to communicate. (Whether I achieved that or not is debatable.) I would argue that a hope of “saving civilization” is not even based in a clear knowing of what we really want. I don’t see that civilized humans want to “save civilization.” To my eye, it looks as though they are actively, though unconsciously, working to unravel the structures of civilization as quickly as they can, mostly by running the machine full-out until it seizes up. I don’t think most people, at their deepest and most essential levels, really want to keep the present system, and its underlying worldview, going.
It comes down, I think, to the ways in which we use the word “hope.” If a “hope” is simply the recognition that there are possibilities out there (in which “there is no hope” would mean “there are no possibilities remaining”) then I am all for it. I don’t think we have, or CAN have, a clear notion of exactly what’s coming, how it will play out, and what remains possible in terms of how it goes. There are too many factors, and too many forces at play, for us to ever say, in my opinion, “there is no hope.” So I agree: “being real, honest, awake and aware does not preclude the recognition that possibilities remain about which we may know very little.”
But I do have an interest in precluding “false hopes,” or at least questioning the possibilities to which people cling without really examining them. And I do have an interest in interrupting “hoping,” if by that we mean, as Derrick Jensen has pointed out, “a longing for a future condition over which you have no agency.” I’m most interested in who we can or will become when all “hoping” is lost, when the false hopes have all been proven false. I have found those points of hopelessness and helplessness in my own life to be essential for my own growth and maturity. My sense is that they will be important for a more general maturation of the collective consciousness.
Hope that helps clarify my thinking a bit. (Language is always slippery in my experience.) As you say, this point can always serve as a starting point for discussion.
Thanks again,
Tim